Where crypto card money actually moves
Every card we track that reports transaction volume for August 2026, sized by its share. Each figure carries the date we last checked it and how it was obtained, because volume is the number issuers are least willing to publish and most likely to round in their own favour.
Every card, ranked — August 2026
| # | Card | Volume | Share | Band | Source | Figure checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RedotPay Crypto Card | $146M | 63.1% | Leader | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 2 | Kast Card | $42M | 18.3% | Leader | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 3 | Ether.fi Cash Card | $39M | 16.8% | Leader | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 4 | Bitget Wallet Card | $2.0M | 0.9% | Emerging | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 5 | Jupiter Card | $1.4M | 0.6% | Emerging | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 6 | Peanut.me Card | $700K | 0.3% | Emerging | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
| 7 | DPT Crypto Card | $200K | 0.1% | Emerging | Checked by hand | 2026-08-12 |
Where these numbers come from
There is no single source that reports transaction volume for every crypto card, and anyone claiming otherwise is guessing. We use three, and label every figure with which one it came from rather than presenting them as equally solid.
- On-chain
- Cards that settle on a public blockchain. We query the settlement contract directly, so the figure is independently verifiable — you can check it yourself without taking our word for it.
- Issuer published
- A number the issuer put out themselves, in a blog post, report or announcement. Real, but it arrives on their schedule and is presented in their framing.
- Checked by hand
- Everything else. Most custodial issuers publish nothing, so these are our own measurements and estimates. Treat them as the least precise of the three, and check the date beside each one.
Volume is a measure of how much a card is used, not how good it is. A large card can still be an expensive one — see the fee comparison for what each actually costs you.